Fiddelke v. French

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Fiddelke v. French

282 A.D. 1062, 126 N.Y.S.2d 918, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5823

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 21, 1953

StatusPublished

This text of 282 A.D. 1062 (Fiddelke v. French) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fiddelke v. French, 282 A.D. 1062, 126 N.Y.S.2d 918, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5823 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

— Consolidated actions to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiffs French and Norman Fiddelke, and for medical expenses and loss of services by plaintiff Herman Fiddelke. The jury rendered verdicts in favor of plaintiffs against defendant Birchfleld and in favor of defendant French against plaintiffs Fiddelke. Defendant Birchfleld appeals from judgments dated January 28, 1953, and February 6, 1953, and from a judgment dated June 18, 1953, resettling the judgment dated February 6, 1953, nunc pro tunc. Resettled judgment dated June 18, 1953, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Appeal from judgment dated February 6, 1953, dismissed, without costs. The judgment has been superseded by the resettled judgment. Appeal from judgment dated January 28, 1953, dismissed. • The judgment is not printed in the record. Present — Nolan, P. J., Adel, Wenzel, MaeCrate and Schmidt, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Consolidated actions to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiffs French and Norman Fiddelke, and for medical expenses and loss of services by plaintiff Herman Fiddelke. The jury rendered verdicts in favor of plaintiffs against defendant Birchfleld and in favor of defendant French against plaintiffs Fiddelke. Defendant Birchfleld appeals from judgments dated January 28, 1953, and February 6, 1953, and from a judgment dated June 18, 1953, resettling the judgment dated February 6, 1953, nunc pro tunc. Resettled judgment dated June 18, 1953, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Appeal from judgment dated February 6, 1953, dismissed, without costs. The judgment has been superseded by the resettled judgment. Appeal from judgment dated January 28, 1953, dismissed. • The judgment is not printed in the record. Present — Nolan, P. J., Adel, Wenzel, MaeCrate and Schmidt, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

282 A.D. 1062, 126 N.Y.S.2d 918, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5823, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fiddelke-v-french-nyappdiv-1953.