Fickling v. Meldrim

148 S.E. 100, 168 Ga. 378, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 146
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided April 10, 1929·No. No. 7137·Published

Opinions

Atkinson, J.

Where a defendant, after conviction of murder, makes a second motion for new trial upon extraordinary grounds based on alleged newly discovered evidence, and service of such motion is duly acknowledged by counsel for the State, and the motion for new trial is thereafter overruled,, and a bill of exceptions complaining of the judgment overruling the motion for new trial is duly presented to the judge and certified to be true, but the judge refuses to grant a supersedeas to prevent execution of the defendant until after the case has been disposed of by the Supreme Court, this court will grant a writ of mandamus, upon application of the defendant, requiring the judge to grant a supersedeas as above indicated. And it is so ordered in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fickling v. Meldrim, 148 S.E. 100, 168 Ga. 378, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 146 (Ga. 1929).

148 S.E. 100 (Fickling v. Meldrim) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cribb v. Parker
46 S.E. 110 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)
Harris v. Roan
46 S.E. 433 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1904)