Fibrebond Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
514 So. 2d 118, 1987 La. LEXIS 10488
Opinion
In re Louisiana, State of; applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “E", No. 314689; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW87 1031.
Granted. The district court judgment on rule to show cause why the State should not deposit money in the registry of the Court is reversed and the rule dismissed because no statute requires the State to deposit funds which may be due under a construction contract. Otherwise the application is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fibrebond Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 514 So. 2d 118, 1987 La. LEXIS 10488 (La. 1987).
514 So. 2d 118 (Fibrebond Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fibrebond Corp. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.
583 So. 2d 848 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1991)