Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

Supreme Court

Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

375 U.S. 963

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJanuary 6, 1964

Docket610

StatusPublished

This text of 375 U.S. 963 (Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, 375 U.S. 963 (1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit granted limited to Questions 1 and 3 presented by the petition which read as follows:

“1. Was Petitioner required by the National Labor Relations Act to bargain with a union representing some of its employees about whether to let to an independent contractor for legitimate business reasons the performance of certain operations in which those employees had been engaged?

“3. Was the Board, in a case involving only a refusal to bargain, empowered to order the resumption of operations which had been discontinued for legitimate business reasons and reinstatement with back pay of the individuals formerly employed therein?”

Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit granted limited to Questions 1 and 3 presented by the petition which read as follows:

“1. Was Petitioner required by the National Labor Relations Act to bargain with a union representing some of its employees about whether to let to an independent contractor for legitimate business reasons the performance of certain operations in which those employees had been engaged?

“3. Was the Board, in a case involving only a refusal to bargain, empowered to order the resumption of operations which had been discontinued for legitimate business reasons and reinstatement with back pay of the individuals formerly employed therein?”

Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

375 U.S. 963, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fibreboard-paper-products-corporation-v-national-labor-relations-board-scotus-1964.