Fiacre v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Fiacre v. State

252 So. 3d 386

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 1, 2018

DocketNo. 1D16-2116

StatusPublished

This text of 252 So. 3d 386 (Fiacre v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fiacre v. State, 252 So. 3d 386 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We affirm Appellant's judgments and sentences for first-degree murder and armed burglary. For the reasons discussed in his co-defendant's case, Lai v. State , No. 1D16-1882, 251 So.3d 333, 2018 WL 3638201(Fla. 1st DCA August 1, 2018), we reject Appellant's claim that the trial court abused its discretion when it denied the motion for mistrial based on the prosecutor's improper vouching of government *387witnesses. We decline to comment on Appellant's other claims.

AFFIRMED .

B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Wolf and Ray, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We affirm Appellant's judgments and sentences for first-degree murder and armed burglary. For the reasons discussed in his co-defendant's case, Lai v. State , No. 1D16-1882, 251 So.3d 333, 2018 WL 3638201(Fla. 1st DCA August 1, 2018), we reject Appellant's claim that the trial court abused its discretion when it denied the motion for mistrial based on the prosecutor's improper vouching of government *387witnesses. We decline to comment on Appellant's other claims.

AFFIRMED .

B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Wolf and Ray, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

252 So. 3d 386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fiacre-v-state-fladistctapp-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack