Fiacre v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Fiacre v. State

252 So. 3d 386

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 1, 2018·No. No. 1D16-2116·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We affirm Appellant's judgments and sentences for first-degree murder and armed burglary. For the reasons discussed in his co-defendant's case, Lai v. State , No. 1D16-1882, 251 So.3d 333, 2018 WL 3638201(Fla. 1st DCA August 1, 2018), we reject Appellant's claim that the trial court abused its discretion when it denied the motion for mistrial based on the prosecutor's improper vouching of government *387witnesses. We decline to comment on Appellant's other claims.

AFFIRMED .

B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Wolf and Ray, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We affirm Appellant's judgments and sentences for first-degree murder and armed burglary. For the reasons discussed in his co-defendant's case, Lai v. State , No. 1D16-1882, 251 So.3d 333, 2018 WL 3638201(Fla. 1st DCA August 1, 2018), we reject Appellant's claim that the trial court abused its discretion when it denied the motion for mistrial based on the prosecutor's improper vouching of government *387witnesses. We decline to comment on Appellant's other claims.

AFFIRMED .

B.L. Thomas, C.J., and Wolf and Ray, JJ., concur.

Fiacre v. State, 252 So. 3d 386 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

252 So. 3d 386 (Fiacre v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related