Fia v. Kreis

246 A.D. 531

This text of 246 A.D. 531 (Fia v. Kreis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fia v. Kreis, 246 A.D. 531 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Opinion

Judgment in plaintiff’s favor for personal injuries suffered while employed by defendant as a domestic servant, by the falling of an electric light globe in the kitchen of the defendant’s house, reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event. The charge of the court at folio 463 was erroneous. (Perlman v. Schanck, 192 App. Div. 179; Bleecker v. Johnston, 69 N. Y. 309; Schwier v. New York Cent. & H. R. R. R. Co., 90 id. 558; Baesens v. New York Central Railroad Co., [3d Dept.] 201 App. Div. 191; Reehil v. Fraas, [2d Dept., per Gaynor, J.] 129 id. 563.) We are also of the opinion that the determination of the jury is against the weight of the evidence. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Scudder, Tompkins and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bleecker v. . Johnston
69 N.Y. 309 (New York Court of Appeals, 1877)
Perlman v. Shanck
192 A.D. 179 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1920)
Baesens v. New York Central Railroad
201 A.D. 191 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
246 A.D. 531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fia-v-kreis-nyappdiv-1935.