Fia v. Kreis

246 A.D. 531

Opinion

Judgment in plaintiff’s favor for personal injuries suffered while employed by defendant as a domestic servant, by the falling of an electric light globe in the kitchen of the defendant’s house, reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, costs to appellant to abide the event. The charge of the court at folio 463 was erroneous. (Perlman v. Schanck, 192 App. Div. 179; Bleecker v. Johnston, 69 N. Y. 309; Schwier v. New York Cent. & H. R. R. R. Co., 90 id. 558; Baesens v. New York Central Railroad Co., [3d Dept.] 201 App. Div. 191; Reehil v. Fraas, [2d Dept., per Gaynor, J.] 129 id. 563.) We are also of the opinion that the determination of the jury is against the weight of the evidence. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Scudder, Tompkins and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fia v. Kreis, 246 A.D. 531 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

246 A.D. 531 (Fia v. Kreis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bleecker v. . Johnston
69 N.Y. 309 (New York Court of Appeals, 1877)
Perlman v. Shanck
192 A.D. 179 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1920)
Baesens v. New York Central Railroad
201 A.D. 191 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1922)