Fewlass v. Abbott
28 Mich. 270, 1873 Mich. LEXIS 195
Opinion
held that the objection to the name in which the suit was brought by the plaintiff is not well taken; that it will not be presumed for the purpose 6f invalidating the judgment in his favor, and in the absence of any showing upon the subject, that the plaintiff has any other name than the one used; and that the release of the surety, whether erroneous or not, could in no. wise prejudice the defendant or affect his liability as principal, and he will not, therefore, be heard to complain of it.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fewlass v. Abbott, 28 Mich. 270, 1873 Mich. LEXIS 195 (Mich. 1873).
28 Mich. 270 (Fewlass v. Abbott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Porter v. Butterfield
89 N.W. 199 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1902)
Stever v. Brown
77 N.W. 704 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1899)
Hinkle v. Collins
71 N.W. 481 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1897)
Scarborough v. Myrick
66 N.W. 867 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1896)
Perry v. State
63 N.W. 26 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1895)
Baker v. Jerome
50 Ohio St. (N.S.) 682 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1893)
German National Bank v. National State Bank
3 Colo. App. 17 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1892)
Fisher v. Northrup
7 L.R.A. 629 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1890)