Fetzer v. Hilliard

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Fetzer v. Hilliard

133 So. 407, 16 La. App. 356, 1931 La. App. LEXIS 82

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedApril 9, 1931

DocketNo. 3009

StatusPublished

This text of 133 So. 407 (Fetzer v. Hilliard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fetzer v. Hilliard, 133 So. 407, 16 La. App. 356, 1931 La. App. LEXIS 82 (La. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

STEPHENS, J.

This is a possessory action in which judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff, recognizing him to be in lawful possession, as owner, of all the property known as the Fetzer Place, in section 4, township 17 north, range 14 west, in Caddo parish, -La.; said Fetzer Place extending to and being bounded by the waters of Cross Lake.

Permanent writs of injunction were issued, restraining the defendant from trespassing upon or in any manner invading the peaceful possession of the plaintiff.

Appeals both suspensive and devolutive were granted the defendant.

No appearances were made by counsel at the trial on appeal, and we have been informed that, due to subsequent develop.ments, the question as now presented is merely a moot one.

A review of the record and the law applicable to the facts therein developed, leads us to the conclusion that the judgment as rendered by the district court is correct.

It is therefore ordered that the judgment appealed from be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI