Fetterhoff's Estate
77 A. 826, 228 Pa. 535, 1910 Pa. LEXIS 521
Opinion
The religious and charitable bequests and devises of the testatrix are void for her failure to have the execution of her will attested by two credible and, at the time, disinterested witnesses, as required by the Act of April 26, 1855, P. L. 328. Under Kessler’s Est., 221 Pa. 314, no one of the three attesting witnesses was disinterested. Nothing more need be said, and the decree is affirmed at appellants’ costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fetterhoff's Estate, 77 A. 826, 228 Pa. 535, 1910 Pa. LEXIS 521 (Pa. 1910).
77 A. 826 (Fetterhoff's Estate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Price
820 A.2d 956 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 2003)
Estate of Tkachuk
73 Cal. App. 3d 14 (California Court of Appeal, 1977)
Tkachuk v. Russian Ukrainian Evangelical Baptist Union
73 Cal. App. 3d 14 (California Court of Appeal, 1977)
Crozer's Estate
145 A. 697 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1929)
Arnold's Estate
94 A. 1076 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1915)
Stinson's Estate
81 A. 207 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1911)