Fetterer v. State
18 Ind. 388
Opinion
Information for selling intoxicating liquor to a minor. Conviction below. It is sufficient for the information to describe the liquor as intoxicating. Groctor v. The State, 6 Blackf. 105; Mullinix v. The State, id. 554; Simpson v. The State, 17 Ind. See the statute, 1 G. & H. p. 614, sec. 2. The affidavit on winch the information was based, charged that the liquor was whisky, and so was the proof. The conviction was right upon the evidence.
The judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fetterer v. State, 18 Ind. 388 (Ind. 1862).
18 Ind. 388 (Fetterer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. American Forcite Powder Manufacturing Co.
11 A. 127 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1887)
State v. Mullinix
6 Blackf. 554 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1843)