Fetterer v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Fetterer v. State

18 Ind. 388

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedMay 15, 1862

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 18 Ind. 388 (Fetterer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fetterer v. State, 18 Ind. 388 (Ind. 1862).

Pincite

Opinion

Perkins, J.

Information for selling intoxicating liquor to a minor. Conviction below. It is sufficient for the information to describe the liquor as intoxicating. Groctor v. The State, 6 Blackf. 105; Mullinix v. The State, id. 554; Simpson v. The State, 17 Ind. See the statute, 1 G. & H. p. 614, sec. 2. The affidavit on winch the information was based, charged that the liquor was whisky, and so was the proof. The conviction was right upon the evidence.

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Perkins, J.

Information for selling intoxicating liquor to a minor. Conviction below. It is sufficient for the information to describe the liquor as intoxicating. Groctor v. The State, 6 Blackf. 105; Mullinix v. The State, id. 554; Simpson v. The State, 17 Ind. See the statute, 1 G. & H. p. 614, sec. 2. The affidavit on winch the information was based, charged that the liquor was whisky, and so was the proof. The conviction was right upon the evidence.

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 Ind. 388, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fetterer-v-state-ind-1862.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack