Fetterer v. State

18 Ind. 388
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1862·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Perkins, J.

Information for selling intoxicating liquor to a minor. Conviction below. It is sufficient for the information to describe the liquor as intoxicating. Groctor v. The State, 6 Blackf. 105; Mullinix v. The State, id. 554; Simpson v. The State, 17 Ind. See the statute, 1 G. & H. p. 614, sec. 2. The affidavit on winch the information was based, charged that the liquor was whisky, and so was the proof. The conviction was right upon the evidence.

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fetterer v. State, 18 Ind. 388 (Ind. 1862).

18 Ind. 388 (Fetterer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. American Forcite Powder Manufacturing Co.
11 A. 127 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1887)
State v. Mullinix
6 Blackf. 554 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1843)