Fett v. Terrangi

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: April 2, 2004
• Docket: 03-7500
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7500

RICHARD S. FETT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

P. A. TERRANGI, Indian Creek Correctional Center and in their individual and official capacity; MONICIA PORCHER, Indian Creek Correctional Center and their individual and official capacity; JOHNNY JONES, Indian Creek Correctional Center and in their individual and official capacity; S. GOYNES, Indian Creek Correctional Center and in their individual and official capacity; ANNA POWERS, in their individual and official capacity,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

CHARLES E. THOMPSON, Staunton Correctional Center and in their individual and official capacity; MAGGIE N. REDMOND, Staunton Correctional Center and in their individual and official capacity; ROBERT W. BYRD, Staunton Correctional Center and in their individual and official capacity; JAMES BROCKINGTON, JR., Indian Creek Correctional Center and in their individual and official capacity; C. WASHINGTON, Indian Creek Correctional Center and in their individual and official capacity,

Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria, T. S. Ellis, III, District Judge (CA-02-271-AM), and at Norfolk, Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge (CA-02-805-2).

Submitted: February 27, 2004 Decided: April 2, 2004

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard S. Fett, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Garrett Hill, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Richard S. Fett appeals the orders of the district court

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -