Fetrow v. Agrico Chemical Co.
645 So. 2d 1053, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10996, 1994 WL 630818
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 14, 1994·No. No. 93-2748·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Appellant challenges numerous aspects of a very detailed workers’ compensation order entered by the Judge of Compensation Claims. The conclusions of the judge set out in paragraph 37 of the order regarding improvements to appellant’s home are not supported by competent substantial evidence. Accordingly, we reverse this portion of the order with directions that the claims for home modification denied by paragraph 37 should be granted. In all other respects we affirm the order under review.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fetrow v. Agrico Chemical Co., 645 So. 2d 1053, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 10996, 1994 WL 630818 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).
645 So. 2d 1053 (Fetrow v. Agrico Chemical Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Blue Reef Holding Corp. v. Coyne
645 So. 2d 1053 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)