Fetell v. Drexler

422 So. 2d 89, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21716
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 23, 1982
DocketNo. 82-823
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 422 So. 2d 89 (Fetell v. Drexler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fetell v. Drexler, 422 So. 2d 89, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21716 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the summary final judgment in favor of Alan Drexler, M.D., upon a holding that a factual basis is a necessary prerequisite to the conclusion that plaintiff’s board-certified surgeon could not testify against a board-certified radiologist regarding the standard of care required during the administration of a diagnostic barium enema. § 768.45(2)(c), Fla.Stat. (1977); see Chenoweth v. Kemp, 396 So.2d 1122 (Fla.1981).

On remand we direct that plaintiff be given an opportunity to establish the qualifications of his expert regarding the administration of the test in question. Chenoweth, 396 So.2d at 1125.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Charlonne v. Rosenthal
642 So. 2d 632 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Brown v. Sims
538 So. 2d 901 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Wright v. Schulte
441 So. 2d 660 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
422 So. 2d 89, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fetell-v-drexler-fladistctapp-1982.