Fetch Interactive Television LLC v. Touchstream Technologies Inc.
Opinion
COURT OF CHANCERY
OF THE
SAM GLASSCOCK III STATE OF DELAWARE COURT OF CHANCERY COURTHOUSE VICE CHANCELLOR 34 THE CIRCLE GEORGETOWN, DELAWARE 19947
September 26, 2022
Sean J. Bellew, Esquire Sean A. Meluney, Esquire 2961 Centerville Rd., Ste. 302 William M. Alleman, Jr., Esquire Wilmington, DE 19808 Stephen A. Spence, Esquire 1143 Savannah Rd., Suite 3-A Lewes, DE 19958
RE: Fetch Interactive Television LLC v. Touchstream Technologies Inc., C.A. No. 2017-0637-SG
Counsel:
This letter memorializes the oral rulings made on Defendants’ Motion in Limine during the pre-trial conference this afternoon. Regarding Mr. David Strober and Mr. John Burns, the Motion is denied without prejudice to Defendants’ right to object to the relevance of those witnesses’ testimony at trial. If Mr. Reff Sykes is to testify, he must do so in person and will be limited to rebuttal testimony. In addition, should Plaintiffs intend to call Mr. Sykes, Defendants must be given the opportunity to depose him before trial.
To the extent the foregoing requires an order to take effect, it is SO ORDERED.
Sincerely,
/s/ Sam Glasscock III
Sam Glasscock III
cc: All counsel of record (by File & ServeXpress)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fetch Interactive Television LLC v. Touchstream Technologies Inc. (Fetch Interactive Television LLC v. Touchstream Technologies Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.