Fetch Interactive Television LLC v. Touchstream Technologies Inc.
This text of Fetch Interactive Television LLC v. Touchstream Technologies Inc. (Fetch Interactive Television LLC v. Touchstream Technologies Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Chancery of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE SAM GLASSCOCK III STATE OF DELAWARE COURT OF CHANCERY COURTHOUSE VICE CHANCELLOR 34 THE CIRCLE GEORGETOWN, DELAWARE 19947
September 26, 2022
Sean J. Bellew, Esquire Sean A. Meluney, Esquire 2961 Centerville Rd., Ste. 302 William M. Alleman, Jr., Esquire Wilmington, DE 19808 Stephen A. Spence, Esquire 1143 Savannah Rd., Suite 3-A Lewes, DE 19958
RE: Fetch Interactive Television LLC v. Touchstream Technologies Inc., C.A. No. 2017-0637-SG
Counsel:
This letter memorializes the oral rulings made on Defendants’ Motion in
Limine during the pre-trial conference this afternoon. Regarding Mr. David Strober
and Mr. John Burns, the Motion is denied without prejudice to Defendants’ right to
object to the relevance of those witnesses’ testimony at trial. If Mr. Reff Sykes is to
testify, he must do so in person and will be limited to rebuttal testimony. In addition,
should Plaintiffs intend to call Mr. Sykes, Defendants must be given the opportunity
to depose him before trial.
To the extent the foregoing requires an order to take effect, it is SO
ORDERED. Sincerely,
/s/ Sam Glasscock III
Sam Glasscock III
cc: All counsel of record (by File & ServeXpress)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Fetch Interactive Television LLC v. Touchstream Technologies Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fetch-interactive-television-llc-v-touchstream-technologies-inc-delch-2022.