Fester v. . Brooklyn Union Elevated Railroad Company
105 N.E. 1085, 210 N.Y. 638, 1914 N.Y. LEXIS 1418
This text of 105 N.E. 1085 (Fester v. . Brooklyn Union Elevated Railroad Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Fester v. . Brooklyn Union Elevated Railroad Company, 105 N.E. 1085, 210 N.Y. 638, 1914 N.Y. LEXIS 1418 (N.Y. 1914).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Chase, Miller and Cardozo, JJ. Dissenting: Hiscock, Collin and CUDDEBAOK, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
105 N.E. 1085, 210 N.Y. 638, 1914 N.Y. LEXIS 1418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fester-v-brooklyn-union-elevated-railroad-company-ny-1914.