Fester v. . Brooklyn Union Elevated Railroad Company

105 N.E. 1085, 210 N.Y. 638, 1914 N.Y. LEXIS 1418
New York Court of Appeals·Decided March 31, 1914·Published

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Chase, Miller and Cardozo, JJ. Dissenting: Hiscock, Collin and CUDDEBAOK, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fester v. . Brooklyn Union Elevated Railroad Company, 105 N.E. 1085, 210 N.Y. 638, 1914 N.Y. LEXIS 1418 (N.Y. 1914).

105 N.E. 1085 (Fester v. . Brooklyn Union Elevated Railroad Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.