Fest v. Agnew

68 A.D.3d 1051, 890 N.Y.2d 357
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 22, 2009·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

The defendant Sergey Barbashov established his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting evidence, including the plaintiffs deposition testimony and the affirmation of Barbashov’s retained examining orthopedist, that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see Charley v Goss, 12 NY3d 750 [2009]; Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys., 98 NY2d 345 [2002]; Gaddy v Eyler, 79 NY2d 955, 956-957 [1992]; Luckey v Bauch, 17 AD3d 411 [2005]; Sims v Megaris, 15 AD3d 468 [2005]; Check v Gacevk, 14 AD3d 586 [2005]; Paul v Trerotola, 11 AD3d 441 [2004]; Mastaccioula v Sciarra, 11 AD3d 434 [2004]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Rivera, J.E, Covello, Angiolillo, Leventhal and Roman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fest v. Agnew, 68 A.D.3d 1051, 890 N.Y.2d 357 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

68 A.D.3d 1051 (Fest v. Agnew) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Estrella v. GEICO Insurance
102 A.D.3d 730 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Riley v. Randazzo
77 A.D.3d 647 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)