Fesenmeyer v. Land Bank of KC

Eighth Circuit

Fesenmeyer v. Land Bank of KC

638 F. App'x 584

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedApril 8, 2016

DocketNo. 15-2629

StatusPublished

This text of 638 F. App'x 584 (Fesenmeyer v. Land Bank of KC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fesenmeyer v. Land Bank of KC, 638 F. App'x 584 (8th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

PAULA FESENMEYER APPEALS AFTER THE DISTRICT COURT¹ DISMISSED HER PRO SE ACTION UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA), AS BARRED BY RES JUDICATA. IN HER BRIEF ON APPEAL, SHE CHALLENGES ONLY THE DISTRICT COURT’S DENIAL OF CERTAIN ACCOMMODATIONS.

UPON CAREFUL REVIEW, WE CONCLUDE THAT THE DISTRICT COURT APPROPRIATELY HANDLED FESENMEYER’S VARIOUS REQUESTS FOR ACCOMMODATIONS. SEE 42 U.S.C. § 12131(1) (UNDER ADA, [585]*585OMITTING FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FROM DEFINITION OF PUBLIC ENTITY); CF. TENNESSEE V. LANE, 541 U.S. 509, 522-23, 530-33, 124 S.Ct. 1978, 158 L.Ed.2d 820 (2004) (DISCUSSING REASONABLE-ACCOMMODATION REQUIREMENTS UNDER ADA AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT). ACCORDINGLY, WE-AFFIRM. SEE 8TH CIR. R. 47B. ALL PENDING MOTIONS ARE DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

PAULA FESENMEYER APPEALS AFTER THE DISTRICT COURT¹ DISMISSED HER PRO SE ACTION UNDER THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA), AS BARRED BY RES JUDICATA. IN HER BRIEF ON APPEAL, SHE CHALLENGES ONLY THE DISTRICT COURT’S DENIAL OF CERTAIN ACCOMMODATIONS.

UPON CAREFUL REVIEW, WE CONCLUDE THAT THE DISTRICT COURT APPROPRIATELY HANDLED FESENMEYER’S VARIOUS REQUESTS FOR ACCOMMODATIONS. SEE 42 U.S.C. § 12131(1) (UNDER ADA, [585]*585OMITTING FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FROM DEFINITION OF PUBLIC ENTITY); CF. TENNESSEE V. LANE, 541 U.S. 509, 522-23, 530-33, 124 S.Ct. 1978, 158 L.Ed.2d 820 (2004) (DISCUSSING REASONABLE-ACCOMMODATION REQUIREMENTS UNDER ADA AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT). ACCORDINGLY, WE-AFFIRM. SEE 8TH CIR. R. 47B. ALL PENDING MOTIONS ARE DENIED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

638 F. App'x 584, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fesenmeyer-v-land-bank-of-kc-ca8-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack