F.E.S. v. Juvenile Officer

Missouri Court of Appeals

F.E.S. v. Juvenile Officer

568 S.W.3d 546

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 26, 2019

DocketWD 81523

StatusPublished

This text of 568 S.W.3d 546 (F.E.S. v. Juvenile Officer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

F.E.S. v. Juvenile Officer, 568 S.W.3d 546 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Following a bench trial in the Circuit Court of Jackson County, F.E.S. (a juvenile) was found to have committed acts which would have constituted the offense of unlawful use of a weapon if committed by an adult. The allegations stemmed from an incident in which a gun was found in a backpack belonging to F.E.S., at the middle school that he attended. The circuit court ordered that F.E.S. be committed to the custody of Family Court Services, but it suspended the execution of that commitment and placed F.E.S. on supervised probation in his mother's custody. F.E.S. appeals. He argues that there was insufficient evidence that he brought the gun into the school, as required by § 571.030.1(10), RSMo. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no *547precedential value, we have provided the parties an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Following a bench trial in the Circuit Court of Jackson County, F.E.S. (a juvenile) was found to have committed acts which would have constituted the offense of unlawful use of a weapon if committed by an adult. The allegations stemmed from an incident in which a gun was found in a backpack belonging to F.E.S., at the middle school that he attended. The circuit court ordered that F.E.S. be committed to the custody of Family Court Services, but it suspended the execution of that commitment and placed F.E.S. on supervised probation in his mother's custody. F.E.S. appeals. He argues that there was insufficient evidence that he brought the gun into the school, as required by § 571.030.1(10), RSMo. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no *547precedential value, we have provided the parties an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

568 S.W.3d 546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fes-v-juvenile-officer-moctapp-2019.