Ferry v. Hammond
This text of 59 Cal. 26 (Ferry v. Hammond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It was decided by this Court, when this case came before it on a former appeal, that the answer of the defendants presented a valid defense to the action, and that the Court erred in sustaining a motion to strike out those portions of it which on this appeal are most material. (Ferry v. Hammond, 2 Pac. C. L. J. 125.)
[28]*28After the case was remanded to the Court below it came on for trial there, and the defendants offered to prove those averments of their answer which this Court had held would constitute a complete defense to the action, and the Court below sustained an objection to the introduction of evidence to prove the same. We think that the exception to this ruling was well taken.
Judgment reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
59 Cal. 26, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferry-v-hammond-cal-1881.