Ferry Hallock Co. v. Progressive Paper Box Co.
75 A. 1100, 76 N.J. Eq. 338, 6 Buchanan 338, 1909 N.J. LEXIS 327
Opinion
The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Emery.
For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Reed, Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Voorhees," Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Gray, Dill, Qongdon—15.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ferry Hallock Co. v. Progressive Paper Box Co., 75 A. 1100, 76 N.J. Eq. 338, 6 Buchanan 338, 1909 N.J. LEXIS 327 (N.J. 1909).
75 A. 1100 (Ferry Hallock Co. v. Progressive Paper Box Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Invengineering, Inc. v. Foregger Co.
184 F. Supp. 366 (D. New Jersey, 1960)