Ferros v. PNC Bank, N.A.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Ferros v. PNC Bank, N.A.

479 S.W.3d 686, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1071, 2015 WL 6160858

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 20, 2015

DocketNo. ED 102766

StatusPublished

This text of 479 S.W.3d 686 (Ferros v. PNC Bank, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ferros v. PNC Bank, N.A., 479 S.W.3d 686, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1071, 2015 WL 6160858 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Chuck Ferros (Ferros) appeals from the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of PNC Bank, N.A. (PNC) on Fer-ros’s petition seeking damages for conversion. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude there is no genuine issue of material fact and PNC is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. ITT Comm. Fin. Corp. v. Mid-Am. Marine Supply Corp., 854 S.W.2d 371, 376 (Mo. banc 1993) and Rule 74.04(c).¹ An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Chuck Ferros (Ferros) appeals from the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of PNC Bank, N.A. (PNC) on Fer-ros’s petition seeking damages for conversion. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude there is no genuine issue of material fact and PNC is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. ITT Comm. Fin. Corp. v. Mid-Am. Marine Supply Corp., 854 S.W.2d 371, 376 (Mo. banc 1993) and Rule 74.04(c).¹ An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

479 S.W.3d 686, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1071, 2015 WL 6160858, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferros-v-pnc-bank-na-moctapp-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack