Ferro v. Steeplechase Amusement Co.
228 A.D. 828
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1930·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Order granting defendant’s motion for a bill of particulars modified by disallowing items V, VI, VII, VIII, IX and X. As so modified, the order, in so far as appealed from, is affirmed, without costs. Plaintiffs are not required to disclose evidentiary facts under the guise of a bill of particulars. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Scudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ferro v. Steeplechase Amusement Co., 228 A.D. 828 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).
228 A.D. 828 (Ferro v. Steeplechase Amusement Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Palazzo v. Abbate
45 A.D.2d 760 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1974)
In re the Estate of Herle
157 Misc. 352 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1935)