Ferro Corp. v. Blaw-Knox Food & Chem. Equip. Co.

696 N.E.2d 226, 82 Ohio St. 3d 1469, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 1957

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided July 8, 1998·No. 98-747·Published

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. Nos. 70804 and 70936. On appeal of American Tank & Fabricating Company. Discretionary appeal denied.

Moyer, C. J., dissents and would allow on Proposition of Law No. 1 only. Resnick and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

On cross-appeal of Ferro Corporation. Discretionary cross-appeal allowed.

Douglas, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

On cross-appeal of Blaw-Knox Food & Chemical Equipment Company. Discretionary cross-appeal denied. ■

Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

On motion for admission pro hoc vice of P. Christian Hague. Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cuyahoga App. Nos. 70804 and 70936. On appeal of American Tank & Fabricating Company. Discretionary appeal denied.

Moyer, C. J., dissents and would allow on Proposition of Law No. 1 only. Resnick and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

On cross-appeal of Ferro Corporation. Discretionary cross-appeal allowed.

Douglas, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

On cross-appeal of Blaw-Knox Food & Chemical Equipment Company. Discretionary cross-appeal denied. ■

Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

On motion for admission pro hoc vice of P. Christian Hague. Motion granted.

Ferro Corp. v. Blaw-Knox Food & Chem. Equip. Co., 696 N.E.2d 226, 82 Ohio St. 3d 1469, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 1957 (Ohio 1998).

Pincite

696 N.E.2d 226 (Ferro Corp. v. Blaw-Knox Food & Chem. Equip. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.