Ferriss v. Ferriss

1 Root 365
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided January 15, 1792·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment — That the plea in bar is insufficient. There are certain cases in which trover is the proper action; there are others in which the action of trespass is the proper remedy; there are others in which either trover or trespass may be brought indifferently; and a recovery in one will be a bar to the other, which is this case. All this was open to the legislature, when they enacted a limitation to actions of trespass, and left the action of trover unrestrained; and this court cannot alter the law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ferriss v. Ferriss, 1 Root 365 (Colo. 1792).

1 Root 365 (Ferriss v. Ferriss) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hickey v. Slattery
131 A. 558 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1926)