Ferris v. State
This text of 166 N.E. 881 (Ferris v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Appellant was charged by an affidavit approved by the prosecuting attorney that he, “on May 23, 1925, at the county of Jay and state of Indiana, did then and there unlawfully have and possess intoxicating liquor with intent to sell, barter, exchange, give away, furnish, or otherwise handle or dispose of, contrary,” etc.
Appellant’s motion to quash the affidavit for the reason that it does not state the offense with sufficient certainty with other reasons, was overruled. The particular objection to the affidavit is that the pleading is uncertain because the several acts alleged are charged disjunctively by the use of the word “or.” The affidavit is in the language of the statute. The appeal is taken from a judgment upon a verdict of guilty. Other questions of law are presented which are unnecessary to be considered to decide the case.
Upon the authority of the case of Graves v. State (1921), 191 Ind. 197, 132 N. E. 369, and cases cited, it is held that overruling appellant’s motion to quash was reversible error.
*216 The case is remanded, and it is ordered that the Jay Circuit Court sustain appellant’s motion to quash the affidavit.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
166 N.E. 881, 201 Ind. 215, 1929 Ind. LEXIS 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferris-v-state-ind-1929.