Ferris v. Harkins

961 A.2d 56, 599 Pa. 164, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 2148
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 25, 2008·No. 185, 186 & 187 MAL 2008·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 25th day of November, 2008 the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue of whether Petitioner is entitled to review by the trial court of her unresolved post-trial motion for a new trial. In reversing the grant of JNOV, the Superior Court overlooked that there was an outstanding motion for lesser relief in the form of a new trial. Therefore, the order of the Superior Court reversing the trial court’s order granting Petitioner’s motion for JNOV is hereby VACATED IN PART, and the matter is remanded to the Superior Court, for remand to the trial court, for consideration of Petitioner’s unresolved motion for a new trial, and preparation and filing of a comprehensive opinion thereon.

Jurisdiction relinquished.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ferris v. Harkins, 961 A.2d 56, 599 Pa. 164, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 2148 (Pa. 2008).

961 A.2d 56 (Ferris v. Harkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Flagler, J. v. Templin, F.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2020