Ferris v. Harkins

961 A.2d 56, 599 Pa. 164
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedNovember 25, 2008
DocketAppeal Nos. 185, 186 & 187 MAL 2008
StatusPublished

This text of 961 A.2d 56 (Ferris v. Harkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ferris v. Harkins, 961 A.2d 56, 599 Pa. 164 (Pa. 2008).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 25th day of November, 2008 the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue of whether Petitioner is entitled to review by the trial court of her unresolved post-trial motion for a new trial. In reversing the grant of JNOV, the Superior Court overlooked that there was an outstanding motion for lesser relief in the form of a new trial. Therefore, the order of the Superior Court reversing the trial court’s order granting Petitioner’s motion for JNOV is hereby VACATED IN PART, and the matter is remanded to the Superior Court, for remand to the trial court, for consideration of Petitioner’s unresolved motion [165]*165for a new trial, and preparation and filing of a comprehensive opinion thereon.

Jurisdiction relinquished.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
961 A.2d 56, 599 Pa. 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferris-v-harkins-pa-2008.