Ferris v. Ferris

895 So. 2d 540, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 3616, 2005 WL 625901
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 18, 2005·No. No. 5D04-2723·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORFINGER, J.

Troy A. and Lora Ferris appeal the entry of a temporary injunction. We reverse the injunction because the trial court failed to make the requisite findings.

A temporary injunction is an extraordinary remedy that should be granted sparingly, and only entered if the party seeking the injunction establishes (1) the likelihood of irreparable harm; (2) the unavailability of an adequate remedy at law; (3) a substantial likelihood of success on the merits; and (4) consideration of the public interest. Yardley v. Albu, 826 So.2d 467, 470 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). Before entering a temporary injunction, the trial court must comply with Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.610(c) by specifying the reasons for the entry of the injunction and describing in reasonable detail the act or acts restrained without reference to a pleading or another document. Id. The court must also set forth clear and definite factual findings in support of each of the four criteria. Milin v. Northwest Florida Land, L.C., 870 So.2d 135, 136 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). On its face, the order being reviewed fails to meet these requirements. Accordingly, the temporary injunction is reversed and this matter is remanded for further proceedings.1

REVERSED and REMANDED.

THOMPSON and PALMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ferris v. Ferris, 895 So. 2d 540, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 3616, 2005 WL 625901 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

895 So. 2d 540 (Ferris v. Ferris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

DiChristopher v. BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RS
908 So. 2d 492 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)