Ferris v. Ferris

43 Fla. 358
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 15, 1901·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having been reached in its regular order on the docket for final adjudication, was referred by the court to -two of its commissioners Mess.’ Maxwell and Glen (Commissioner Hacker having decided the case below), for'investigation, who report that indispensably necessary parties have been omitted from the appeal; and the court upon due consideration of the transcript of- record finding their report to be correct, and that such omitted and necessary parties have, in no manner been brought within the jurisdiction I oí t(his court, it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged that the'said appeal in said cause be, and the same is, hereby dismissed at the cost of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ferris v. Ferris, 43 Fla. 358 (Fla. 1901).

43 Fla. 358 (Ferris v. Ferris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hay v. Isetts
125 So. 237 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1929)
McJunkins v. Stevens
102 So. 756 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1925)
Jones v. Miller
81 So. 413 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1919)
Henry Vogt Machine Co. v. Milton Land & Investment Co.
76 So. 695 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1917)
Rawls v. Carlton
56 Fla. 843 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1908)