Ferris C. Cassius v. United States

Tenth Circuit

Ferris C. Cassius v. United States

287 F.2d 571

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

DecidedNovember 21, 1960

Docket6507_1

StatusPublished

This text of 287 F.2d 571 (Ferris C. Cassius v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ferris C. Cassius v. United States, 287 F.2d 571 (10th Cir. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

287 F.2d 571

Ferris C. CASSIUS
v.
UNITED STATES of America.

No. 6507.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

Nov. 21, 1960.

Douglas G. McKinnon, Denver, Colo., for appellant.

Donald G. Brotzman, U.S. Atty., and Jack K. Anderson, Asst. U.S. Atty., Denver, Colo., for appellee.

Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed for failure of appellant diligently to prosecute.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

287 F.2d 571

Ferris C. CASSIUS
v.
UNITED STATES of America.

No. 6507.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

Nov. 21, 1960.

Douglas G. McKinnon, Denver, Colo., for appellant.

Donald G. Brotzman, U.S. Atty., and Jack K. Anderson, Asst. U.S. Atty., Denver, Colo., for appellee.

Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed for failure of appellant diligently to prosecute.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

287 F.2d 571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferris-c-cassius-v-united-states-ca10-1960.