Ferris' Administrator v. Hunt
This text of 18 Mo. 480 (Ferris' Administrator v. Hunt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court. ■
Thomas D. Yeats, administrator of Jabez Ferris, commenced suit in a justice’s court against James Hunt, where there was a judgment for the defendant. An appeal was taken to the Circuit Court. While this appeal was pending, Yeats died, and on motion, Levi Ashley was substituted as the plaintiff in the stead of Yeats, whose death was suggested. This was done without notice or consent, or the voluntary appearance of the adverse party, or scire facias.
1. Although the present practice act prescribes that, in the event of the death of a party, the court, on motion, may allow the^aetion to be continued by the representative in interest, yet that cannot be done but in subservience to principles of law. It would be against the first, rules of justice to permit a party in a court to take a step which might seriously affect his adversary’s rights, without his consent or without notice or scire facias. The sixteenth section of the practice act of 1845, art. 5, provides that all orders made for the substitution of any person as plaintiff or defendant, in place of the original plaintiff or defendant, shall be made, either upon the voluntary appearance of the adverse original party, or after the service upon such party.of a scire facias. We hold this section to be [481]*481unrepealed by the late act, as it is silent in regard to the manner in which the opposite party is to be brought in when a substitution is to be made.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
18 Mo. 480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferris-administrator-v-hunt-mo-1853.