Ferrigno v. Mills, No. Cv 94 56554 S (Feb. 21, 1995)

Connecticut Superior Court

Ferrigno v. Mills, No. Cv 94 56554 S (Feb. 21, 1995)

1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 1732

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedFebruary 21, 1995

DocketNo. CV 94 56554 S

StatusUnpublished

This text of 1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 1732 (Ferrigno v. Mills, No. Cv 94 56554 S (Feb. 21, 1995)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ferrigno v. Mills, No. Cv 94 56554 S (Feb. 21, 1995), 1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 1732 (Colo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION The motion to dismiss was filed more than thirty days after CT Page 1733 defendant's appearance was filed. Appearance was filed on October 28, 1994. The motion was filed on November 29, 1994. This is in' violation of Connecticut Practice Book §§ 142 and 144 and, therefore, lack of jurisdiction is waived. See Concept AssociatesLtd. v. Board of Tax Review, 229 Conn. 618, 620-21 (1994); NewHaven Loan Co. v. Affinito, 122 Conn. 151 (1939) and Brunswick v.Inland Wetlands Commission, 222 Conn. 541 (1992).

Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is denied.

Plaintiffs should file an amendment to amend the return date.

Rittenband, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION The motion to dismiss was filed more than thirty days after CT Page 1733 defendant's appearance was filed. Appearance was filed on October 28, 1994. The motion was filed on November 29, 1994. This is in' violation of Connecticut Practice Book §§ 142 and 144 and, therefore, lack of jurisdiction is waived. See Concept AssociatesLtd. v. Board of Tax Review, 229 Conn. 618, 620-21 (1994); NewHaven Loan Co. v. Affinito, 122 Conn. 151 (1939) and Brunswick v.Inland Wetlands Commission, 222 Conn. 541 (1992).

Accordingly, the motion to dismiss is denied.

Plaintiffs should file an amendment to amend the return date.

Rittenband, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 1732, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferrigno-v-mills-no-cv-94-56554-s-feb-21-1995-connsuperct-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack