Ferriere v. Pete Sublett & Co.

78 A.D.2d 834, 434 N.Y.S.2d 652, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13511
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 20, 1980·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered January 8, 1980, reversed, on the law and the facts, and the motion of defendant-respondent to dismiss the complaint for lack of jurisdiction unanimously denied, with costs and disbursements. Defendant-respondent has sufficiently projected itself into this State in connection with the subject matter of the litigation to have conferred jurisdiction on our courts. In addition, it still has on file a certificate of doing business here, and has designated the Secretary of State its agent to accept service of process in its behalf. (See Pohlers v Exeter Mfg. Co., 293 NY 274.) Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sandler, Markewich, Bloom and Yesawich, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ferriere v. Pete Sublett & Co., 78 A.D.2d 834, 434 N.Y.S.2d 652, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13511 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

78 A.D.2d 834 (Ferriere v. Pete Sublett & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cox v. State Farm General Insurance
23 Misc. 3d 628 (Buffalo City Court, 2009)