Ferri v. Gallup Organization

Eighth Circuit

Ferri v. Gallup Organization

92 F. App'x 380

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided March 26, 2004·No. No. 03-2586·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Joseph R. Ferri (Ferri) appeals following the district court’s¹ adverse grant of summary judgment in his action claiming age discrimination. After careful de novo review of the record, see Schiltz v. Burlington N. R.R., 115 F.3d 1407, 1411 (8th Cir.1997), we discern no prejudicial error in the court’s grant of summary judgment, and we affirm. Further, we find no abuse [381]*381of discretion in the district court’s denial of Ferri’s motion to amend his complaint, see Hannah v. City of Overland, Mo., 795 F.2d 1385, 1392-93 (8th Cir.1986) (standard of review), or in the court’s discovery rulings, see Roberts v. Shawnee Mission Ford. Inc., 352 F.3d 358, 360 (8th Cir.2003) (standard of review).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Joseph R. Ferri (Ferri) appeals following the district court’s¹ adverse grant of summary judgment in his action claiming age discrimination. After careful de novo review of the record, see Schiltz v. Burlington N. R.R., 115 F.3d 1407, 1411 (8th Cir.1997), we discern no prejudicial error in the court’s grant of summary judgment, and we affirm. Further, we find no abuse [381]*381of discretion in the district court’s denial of Ferri’s motion to amend his complaint, see Hannah v. City of Overland, Mo., 795 F.2d 1385, 1392-93 (8th Cir.1986) (standard of review), or in the court’s discovery rulings, see Roberts v. Shawnee Mission Ford. Inc., 352 F.3d 358, 360 (8th Cir.2003) (standard of review).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Ferri v. Gallup Organization, 92 F. App'x 380 (8th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

92 F. App'x 380 (Ferri v. Gallup Organization) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related