Ferres v. City of New Rochelle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ferres v. City of New Rochelle

112 A.D.2d 918, 491 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52131

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 5, 1985

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 112 A.D.2d 918 (Ferres v. City of New Rochelle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ferres v. City of New Rochelle, 112 A.D.2d 918, 491 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52131 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Marbach, J.), dated February 15, 1984, which, upon a jury verdict apportioning liabil[919]*919ity equally between plaintiffs and defendant, was in favor of plaintiffs in the sum of $26,255.31.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

At trial, plaintiffs produced ample evidence from which the defendant’s negligence could be inferred. Thus, this issue was properly submitted to the jury. Furthermore, we agree with the Trial Judge’s conclusion that General Obligations Law § 9-103 does not apply to the facts of this case. Lazer, J. P., Thompson, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Marbach, J.), dated February 15, 1984, which, upon a jury verdict apportioning liabil[919]*919ity equally between plaintiffs and defendant, was in favor of plaintiffs in the sum of $26,255.31.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

At trial, plaintiffs produced ample evidence from which the defendant’s negligence could be inferred. Thus, this issue was properly submitted to the jury. Furthermore, we agree with the Trial Judge’s conclusion that General Obligations Law § 9-103 does not apply to the facts of this case. Lazer, J. P., Thompson, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

112 A.D.2d 918, 491 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferres-v-city-of-new-rochelle-nyappdiv-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack