Ferrero v. Unemployment Appeals Commission

829 So. 2d 993, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 16822, 2002 WL 31505672
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 13, 2002·No. No. 2D01-4201·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

BLUE, Chief Judge.

Erik P. Ferrero appeals the order by the Unemployment Appeals Commission (UAC) that dismissed his appeal as untimely. He argues on appeal that he did not receive a copy of the appeals referee’s order. As in Landrum v. James Rummer Timber Harvesting, Inc., 645 So.2d 577, 578 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994), because the mailing date on the referee’s decision was insufficient to rebut such a claim, “the record on appeal does not contain competent substantial evidence to support the UAC’s finding that the appeal was untimely.” Alternatively, it is possible that Ferrero was attempting to appeal the repayment decision, in which case the appeal was timely. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing on whether the appeal was timely.

Reversed and remanded.

DAVIS and KELLY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ferrero v. Unemployment Appeals Commission, 829 So. 2d 993, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 16822, 2002 WL 31505672 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

829 So. 2d 993 (Ferrero v. Unemployment Appeals Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ebersol v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N
845 So. 2d 945 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)