Ferrell v. State
This text of 187 S.W.2d 227 (Ferrell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Assault with intent to murder is the offense; the punishment, two years in the penitentiary.
Appellant does not seriously contend that the facts showing that he shot the injured party in the left wrist at close range with a 12-gauge shotgun were not sufficient to authorize the jury’s conclusion of guilt. His contention is that the facts also raised the issue of accidental shooting, which should have been submitted to the jury notwithstanding the fact that no exception or objection was reserved to the court’s charge or special requested charge seeking to have that issue submitted.
Under the express provision of Arts. 658 and 659, C. C. P. objection to the charge must be presented before it is read to the jury. We are precluded from considering his contention. See Hanvy v. State, 144 Tex. Cr. R. 357, 162 S. W. (2d) 721. More *341 over, we note that appellant, by his own testimony, claimed that he shot in self-defense. He made no claim that the shooting was accidental.
The judgment is affirmed.
The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
187 S.W.2d 227, 148 Tex. Crim. 340, 1945 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 721, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferrell-v-state-texcrimapp-1945.