Ferrell v. Oregon Short Line R. R. Co.

256 P. 104, 44 Idaho 217, 1927 Ida. LEXIS 82
CourtIdaho Supreme Court
DecidedApril 28, 1927
DocketNo. 4547.
StatusPublished

This text of 256 P. 104 (Ferrell v. Oregon Short Line R. R. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ferrell v. Oregon Short Line R. R. Co., 256 P. 104, 44 Idaho 217, 1927 Ida. LEXIS 82 (Idaho 1927).

Opinion

*221 T. BAILEY LEE, J.

This appeal involved two separate cases brought to recover damages and attorney’s fees for the killing of two cows by one of defendant’s trains at Jonathan, Idaho, on May 5, 1923. The complaints alleged in substance that on the specific date one of defendant’s trains struck and killed the two cows in question near Jonathan station at a point where defendant was required by C. S., sec. 4814, to fence its right of way; that defendant had failed to do so, and was liable under the statute for the damages caused plaintiffs. The defendant admitted the killing of the animals, but denied they were killed at a place where defendant was by the statute required to fence its tracks and right of way. It alleged they were killed while trespassing on defendant’s premises which were by defendant necessarily and actually used as a station grounds; that such premises were unfenced for the purpose of affording access and egress of passengers and freight for transportation, and that by reason thereof- it was neither practicable nor feasible for defendant to, and it was not by law required to, maintain fences or cattle-guards at the point where the animals entered upon the right of way or at the point where they were struck and killed.

By agreement the cases were consolidated for trial. At the conclusion of the evidence, defendant moved for a directed verdict, which motion was denied. It then requested that the court give defendant’s requested instruction No. 1, instructing the jury to return a verdict in defendant’s favor. This request was refused; and the court later denied defendant’s motion for judgment non obstante veredicto. Upon the verdict returned, judgments for damages and attorney’s fees were entered in favor of the respective plaintiffs.

Defendant appealed specifying as error the' rulings of the court before mentioned, and the giving by the court at the request of plaintiffs of the instruction hereinafter set out.

*222 The condition of the premises fairly shown by the following plat, and the testimony adduced, would seem to establish the following facts:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Smith
1913 OK 752 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1913)
Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. McCall
1915 OK 301 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1915)
Gulp, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Blankenbeckler
35 S.W. 331 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1896)
Strong v. Oregon Short Line Railroad
169 P. 179 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1917)
Baker v. Southern California Railway Co.
46 P. 604 (California Supreme Court, 1896)
Miller v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad
105 P. 909 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1910)
Chicago, B. & Q. R. v. Hogan
46 N.W. 1015 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1890)
Burnham v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.
119 N.W. 235 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1909)
Wilmot v. Oregon Railroad
87 P. 528 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1906)
Wilcox v. Lantz
64 N.W. 735 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1895)
Schneekloth v. Chicago & West Michigan Railway Co.
65 N.W. 663 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1895)
Rabidon v. Chicago & West Michigan Railway Co.
39 L.R.A. 405 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1897)
Knop v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co.
187 P. 1020 (Montana Supreme Court, 1920)
Bowers v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co.
201 P. 825 (Montana Supreme Court, 1921)
Reid v. San Pedro, L. A. & S. L. R. Co.
132 P. 253 (Utah Supreme Court, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
256 P. 104, 44 Idaho 217, 1927 Ida. LEXIS 82, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferrell-v-oregon-short-line-r-r-co-idaho-1927.