Ferrell v. Ohio State Univ. Med. Ctr.
This text of 2023 Ohio 4890 (Ferrell v. Ohio State Univ. Med. Ctr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as Ferrell v. Ohio State Univ. Med. Ctr., 2023-Ohio-4890.]
IN THE COURT OF CLAIMS OF OHIO
MEGAN FERRELL, et al. Case No. 2018-00002JD
Plaintiffs Judge Dale A. Crawford
v. DECISION
THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, et al.
Defendants
{¶1} On December 28, 2023, in M.F. v. Ohio State Univ. Med. Ctr., 10th Dist. Franklin No. 23AP-297, 2023-Ohio-4799, ¶ 23, the Tenth District Court of Appeals reversed this Court’s judgment and remanded this matter for further proceedings in accordance with law and consistent with the court of appeals’ decision. In M.F. at ¶ 19, the court of appeals instructed: “[W]e are not remanding the case for a new trial; rather, we are remanding the case for the Court of Claims to review Dr. Duboe’s videorecorded trial deposition testimony and determine whether that testimony alters its previous disposition on M.F.’s claims.” {¶2} The Court has reviewed the two-plus hour videorecorded trial testimony of Fred J. Duboe, M.D., as directed by the Tenth District Court of Appeals.1 After reviewing Dr. Duboe’s videorecorded trial testimony, the Court finds that Dr. Duboe’s videorecorded trial testimony does not alter the Court’s previous disposition of the claims (including M.F.’s claims) in this case. The Court is unable to determine the proximate cause of Cameroun Ferrell's injuries. Based upon the testimony of all witnesses, as well as Dr. Duboe’s videorecorded trial testimony, the Court determines that the weight of the evidence is equally balanced and, consequently, Plaintiffs have failed to prove their
1 A written copy of the deposition was not filed with the court. Case No. 2018-00002JD -2- DECISION
claims by a preponderance of the evidence in this matter. Judgment will again be entered in favor of Defendants.
DALE A. CRAWFORD Judge [Cite as Ferrell v. Ohio State Univ. Med. Ctr., 2023-Ohio-4890.]
v. JUDGMENT ENTRY
{¶3} For reasons stated in the Decision filed concurrently herewith, judgment is entered in favor of Defendants. Court costs are assessed equally against Plaintiffs. The Clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal.
DALE A. CRAWFORD Judge
Filed December 29, 2023 Sent to S.C. Reporter 1/30/24
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2023 Ohio 4890, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferrell-v-ohio-state-univ-med-ctr-ohioctcl-2023.