Ferrel v. Gaddis

400 N.W.2d 517, 135 Wis. 2d 515, 1986 Wisc. App. LEXIS 4096
CourtCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin
DecidedDecember 18, 1986
DocketNo. 86-1270
StatusPublished

This text of 400 N.W.2d 517 (Ferrel v. Gaddis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Wisconsin primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ferrel v. Gaddis, 400 N.W.2d 517, 135 Wis. 2d 515, 1986 Wisc. App. LEXIS 4096 (Wis. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

GARTZKE, P.J.

Robert Ferrel appeals from an order dismissing his appeal to the circuit court for review of a recount determination by the Wautoma City Board of Canvassers that he lost a municipal election. The issue is whether sec. 801.15(1), Stats., applies when computing the five-day limitation in sec. 9.01(6)(a), Stats., on the time to serve notice of the appeal. The circuit court held that the computation is made without regard to sec. 801.15(1). We agree and affirm.

Tuesday, April 8, 1986, the board of canvassers determined that Ferrel had lost the election by one vote. The following Tuesday, April 15, 1986, Ferrel served notice of his appeal from that determination.

Section 9.01(6), Stats., provides in part: "(a) Within 5 days after completion of the recount determination by the board of canvassers,... any candidate ... aggrieved by the recount may appeal to circuit court. The appeal shall commence by serving a written notice of appeal on the other candidates-” Section 9.01 (7) (b) provides in part: “Those provisions of chs. 801 to 806 which are inconsistent with a prompt and expeditious hearing do not apply to appeals under this section.”

Section 801.15(1), Stats., provides that when computing the time prescribed or allowed by chs. 801-847 or by any other statute governing actions and special proceedings, “When the period of time prescribed or [517]*517allowed is less than 7 days, Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays shall be excluded in the computation.”1

Since the issue involves the proper reading of a statute, we decide the matter without deference to the decision of the trial court. St. John Vianney Sch. v. Janesville Ed. Bd., 114 Wis. 2d 140, 150, 336 N.W.2d 387, 391 (Ct. App. 1983).

State ex rel. McIntyre v. Board of Election Comm., 273 Wis. 395, 401-02, 78 N.W.2d 752, 756 (1956), held that the interests of the electors are served by a strict compliance with recount procedures. Sec. 9.01(7) (b), Stats., which was created by 1983 Wis. Act 183 sec 34, reflects the same principle. The weekend and holidays exclusion in sec. 801.15(1), Stats., is inconsistent with a prompt and expeditious hearing on an appeal recount.

Consequently, the five-day period prescribed in sec. 9.01 (6)(a), Stats., is computed by excluding the first day and including the last day. Sec. 990.001(4)(a), Stats. Because the last day, April 13, was a Sunday, it is excluded. Sec. 990.001(4)(b), Stats. The last day to serve notice of Ferrel’s appeal was Monday, April 14. He served it the next day, too late.

Because notice of Ferrel’s appeal was not timely [518]*518served under sec. 9.01(6)(a), Stats., the trial court properly dismissed the appeal.

By the Court. — Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

St. John Vianney School v. Board of Education of School District of Janesville
336 N.W.2d 387 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 1983)
State Ex Rel. McIntyre v. Board of Election Commissioners
78 N.W.2d 752 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
400 N.W.2d 517, 135 Wis. 2d 515, 1986 Wisc. App. LEXIS 4096, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferrel-v-gaddis-wisctapp-1986.