Ferrebee v. Boggs

247 N.E.2d 753, 18 Ohio St. 2d 87, 47 Ohio Op. 2d 237, 1969 Ohio LEXIS 374
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 14, 1969·No. No. 68-712·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It is clear from the record, the briefs and oral argument that a valid bill of exceptions containing evidence submitted in the trial of March 1967, was properly filed and certified, as required by Section 2321.06, Revised Code, and was duly filed in the Court of Appeals.

The clerk’s failure to officially stamp it cannot prevent the court from using it to consider issues on appeal. King v. Penn, 43 Ohio St. 57; Cincinnati Traction Co. v. Ruthman, 85 Ohio St. 62. See, also, Lewis v. Public Finance Corp., 9 Ohio App. 2d 215.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded to that court for consideration upon the merits, with instructions to consider appellant’s bill of exceptions.

Judgment reversed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neihl, Schneider, Herbert and Duncan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ferrebee v. Boggs, 247 N.E.2d 753, 18 Ohio St. 2d 87, 47 Ohio Op. 2d 237, 1969 Ohio LEXIS 374 (Ohio 1969).

247 N.E.2d 753 (Ferrebee v. Boggs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rogers v. Fuerst
2014 Ohio 2774 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2014)
City of Zanesville v. Rouse
2010 Ohio 2218 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2010)
Wagner v. Fulton Industries, Inc.
686 N.E.2d 559 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1997)
Capparell v. Love
651 N.E.2d 484 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1994)
In Re Hopple
468 N.E.2d 129 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1983)
Ferrebee v. Boggs
263 N.E.2d 574 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1970)