Ferraro v. Finger Lakes Racing Ass'n
159 A.D.2d 1028, 555 N.Y.S.2d 645, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3413
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Ferraro v. Finger Lakes Racing Ass'n. Read the opinion of the Court — 182 A.D.2d 1072 →
Opinion
Order affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Upon our review of the record, we conclude that plaintiffs have failed to demonstrate a likelihood of ultimate success on the merits (see, Newco Waste Sys. v Swartzenberg, 125 AD2d 1004, 1005). Accordingly, Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion of each plaintiff for a preliminary injunction. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Cornelius, J. — preliminary injunction.) Present— Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Davis and Lowery, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ferraro v. Finger Lakes Racing Ass'n, 159 A.D.2d 1028, 555 N.Y.S.2d 645, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3413 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).
159 A.D.2d 1028 (Ferraro v. Finger Lakes Racing Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Newco Waste Systems, Inc. v. Swartzenberg
125 A.D.2d 1004 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)