Ferraris v. Ferraris

California Court of Appeal

Ferraris v. Ferraris

211 P. 470, 59 Cal. App. 678, 1922 Cal. App. LEXIS 173

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedNovember 17, 1922

DocketCiv. No. 4361.

StatusPublished

This text of 211 P. 470 (Ferraris v. Ferraris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ferraris v. Ferraris, 211 P. 470, 59 Cal. App. 678, 1922 Cal. App. LEXIS 173 (Cal. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

NOURSE, J.

Plaintiff commenced this proceeding to obtain a divorce from the defendant on the ground of her adultery. She filed an answer to his complaint and also a cross-complaint based upon the ground of extreme cruelty. The interlocutory decree was rendered in favor of the plaintiff and relief under the. cross-complaint was denied. The defendant appeals from this decree. The only ground of *679 the appeal is that the evidence is insufficient to support the findings made by the trial court.

We have made a thorough examination of the record, including the testimony of the various witnesses. This testimony presents the common story of a case of this nature. The witnesses called on behalf of the husband testified to facts and circumstances which were as positively denied by those called on behalf of the wife. It would serve no purpose to detail any of this testimony. The trial court had all the witnesses before it and concluded that the husband’s charges were true. When the evidence is in such conflict it is not for this court to set aside the finding of the trial court.

Judgment affirmed.

Langdon, P. J., and Sturtevant, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOURSE, J.

Plaintiff commenced this proceeding to obtain a divorce from the defendant on the ground of her adultery. She filed an answer to his complaint and also a cross-complaint based upon the ground of extreme cruelty. The interlocutory decree was rendered in favor of the plaintiff and relief under the. cross-complaint was denied. The defendant appeals from this decree. The only ground of *679 the appeal is that the evidence is insufficient to support the findings made by the trial court.

We have made a thorough examination of the record, including the testimony of the various witnesses. This testimony presents the common story of a case of this nature. The witnesses called on behalf of the husband testified to facts and circumstances which were as positively denied by those called on behalf of the wife. It would serve no purpose to detail any of this testimony. The trial court had all the witnesses before it and concluded that the husband’s charges were true. When the evidence is in such conflict it is not for this court to set aside the finding of the trial court.

Judgment affirmed.

Langdon, P. J., and Sturtevant, J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

211 P. 470, 59 Cal. App. 678, 1922 Cal. App. LEXIS 173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferraris-v-ferraris-calctapp-1922.