Ferrari v. Murray
This text of 25 N.E. 970 (Ferrari v. Murray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
W. Allen, J.
The defence was a breach of warranty that the monument should be free from all imperfections. The question put by the defendant to the plaintiffs’ witnesses on cross-examination, to show the plaintiff Ferrari’s knowledge of a particular process described to him of mending and concealing cracks in granite, was immaterial. The plaintiffs’ knowledge of a process by which cracks could be concealed had no tendency to prove that cracks existed, and, if cracks did exist, it was immaterial whether the plaintiffs did or did not know of them, or attempt to conceal them. A majority of the court are of opinion that the entry should be,
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 N.E. 970, 152 Mass. 496, 1890 Mass. LEXIS 106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferrari-v-murray-mass-1890.