Ferrari v. Lowenstein & Co., P.A.

863 So. 2d 1286, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 621, 2004 WL 133989
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 28, 2004
DocketNo. 3D03-1131
StatusPublished

This text of 863 So. 2d 1286 (Ferrari v. Lowenstein & Co., P.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ferrari v. Lowenstein & Co., P.A., 863 So. 2d 1286, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 621, 2004 WL 133989 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of unemployment benefits based on the Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission’s finding of misconduct connected with work, see § 443.036(29), Fla. Stat. (2002), as we must accept the findings of fact made by the appeals referee where the findings are supported by competent substantial evidence in the record. See St. Augustine Church v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 754 So.2d 183 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Fink v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 665 So.2d 373 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

St. Augustine Church v. FLA. UNEMP. APP. COM'N.
754 So. 2d 183 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Fink v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Com'n
665 So. 2d 373 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
863 So. 2d 1286, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 621, 2004 WL 133989, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferrari-v-lowenstein-co-pa-fladistctapp-2004.