Ferrari v. Lowenstein & Co., P.A.
863 So. 2d 1286, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 621, 2004 WL 133989
Opinion
We affirm the denial of unemployment benefits based on the Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission’s finding of misconduct connected with work, see § 443.036(29), Fla. Stat. (2002), as we must accept the findings of fact made by the appeals referee where the findings are supported by competent substantial evidence in the record. See St. Augustine Church v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 754 So.2d 183 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Fink v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 665 So.2d 373 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ferrari v. Lowenstein & Co., P.A., 863 So. 2d 1286, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 621, 2004 WL 133989 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
863 So. 2d 1286 (Ferrari v. Lowenstein & Co., P.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
St. Augustine Church v. FLA. UNEMP. APP. COM'N.
754 So. 2d 183 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Fink v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Com'n
665 So. 2d 373 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)