Ferrari v. Birdsong

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ferrari v. Birdsong

330 So. 2d 204, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14972

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 13, 1976

DocketNo. 75-824

StatusPublished

This text of 330 So. 2d 204 (Ferrari v. Birdsong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ferrari v. Birdsong, 330 So. 2d 204, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14972 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Ferrari and his wife sued Charles Birdsong and his wife on a written agreement of the Birdsong’s to hold the Ferraris harmless on a claim for a real estate brokerage commission. The Birdsongs answered claiming that the agreement was void as being without consideration because it was exacted by the Ferraris as a condition for the performance of the contract to buy the real property after the terms of the purchase were fully determined by written contract but not fully performed by the Ferraris. After a trial before the court without jury, judgment was entered for the Birdsongs and this appeal followed.

We affirm upon authority of the holding in F. L. Stitt & Co. v. Powell, 94 Fla. 550, 114 So. 375 (1927). See also 17 Am.Jur.2d Contracts § 461; and Spann v. Baltzell, 1 Fla. 301, 46 Am.Dec. 346 (1847).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Ferrari and his wife sued Charles Birdsong and his wife on a written agreement of the Birdsong’s to hold the Ferraris harmless on a claim for a real estate brokerage commission. The Birdsongs answered claiming that the agreement was void as being without consideration because it was exacted by the Ferraris as a condition for the performance of the contract to buy the real property after the terms of the purchase were fully determined by written contract but not fully performed by the Ferraris. After a trial before the court without jury, judgment was entered for the Birdsongs and this appeal followed.

We affirm upon authority of the holding in F. L. Stitt & Co. v. Powell, 94 Fla. 550, 114 So. 375 (1927). See also 17 Am.Jur.2d Contracts § 461; and Spann v. Baltzell, 1 Fla. 301, 46 Am.Dec. 346 (1847).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

330 So. 2d 204, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 14972, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferrari-v-birdsong-fladistctapp-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack