Ferrari Financial Services, Inc. v. 170 NE 40 Street, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ferrari Financial Services, Inc. v. 170 NE 40 Street, Inc.

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 17, 2025

Docket3D2024-2017

StatusPublished

This text of Ferrari Financial Services, Inc. v. 170 NE 40 Street, Inc. (Ferrari Financial Services, Inc. v. 170 NE 40 Street, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ferrari Financial Services, Inc. v. 170 NE 40 Street, Inc., (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed September 17, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D24-2017 Lower Tribunal No. 22-11060-CA-01 ________________

Ferrari Financial Services, Inc., Appellant,

vs.

170 NE 40 Street, Inc., et al., Appellees.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jose M. Rodriguez, Judge.

Saul Ewing LLP, and Carmen Contreras-Martinez, and Alexandra Spaw, and Katherine S. Barrett Wiik (Minneapolis, MN), for appellant.

Roniel Rodriguez, IV, P.A., and Roniel Rodriguez, for appellees.

Before EMAS, MILLER, and LOBREE, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 56.15, Fla. Stat. (2024) (“If any execution issues

illegally, the judgment debtor may obtain a stay by making and delivering an

affidavit to the officer having the execution, stating the illegality and whether

any part of the execution is due, with a bond with surety payable to the

judgment creditor. . . . [I]f [the execution] is adjudged legal in whole or in part,

the court shall enter judgment against the principal and surety on such bond

for the amount of so much of the execution as is adjudged to be legal and

execution shall issue thereon.”) (emphasis added); § 56.16, Fla. Stat. (“If any

person . . . other than the judgment debtor claims any property levied on, he

or she may obtain possession of the property by filing with the officer having

the execution an affidavit by the claimant . . . that the property claimed

belongs to the claimant and by furnishing the officer a bond . . . conditioned

to deliver said property on demand of said officer if it is adjudged to be the

property of the judgment debtor and to pay the judgment creditor all damages

found against the claimant if it appears that the claim was interposed for the

purpose of delay.”) (emphasis added).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI