Ferrante v. Ferrante

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ferrante v. Ferrante

260 A.D.2d 576, 688 N.Y.S.2d 625, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4079

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 19, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 260 A.D.2d 576 (Ferrante v. Ferrante) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ferrante v. Ferrante, 260 A.D.2d 576, 688 N.Y.S.2d 625, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4079 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Pearce, J.), dated January 28, 1998, which denied his objections to an order of the same court (Adams, H.É.), dated September 25, 1997, which, after a hearing, denied his request for a downward modification of child support.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

In order to establish entitlement to a downward modification of child support, the movant must demonstrate an “unanticipated and unreasonable change in circumstances” (Matter of Beck v Beck, 228 AD2d 672, 673) which is substantial (Matter of Boden v Boden, 42 NY2d 210). The father failed to meet his burden in this case (see, Matter of Wolfson v Wolfson, 248 AD2d 479). O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Pearce, J.), dated January 28, 1998, which denied his objections to an order of the same court (Adams, H.É.), dated September 25, 1997, which, after a hearing, denied his request for a downward modification of child support.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

In order to establish entitlement to a downward modification of child support, the movant must demonstrate an “unanticipated and unreasonable change in circumstances” (Matter of Beck v Beck, 228 AD2d 672, 673) which is substantial (Matter of Boden v Boden, 42 NY2d 210). The father failed to meet his burden in this case (see, Matter of Wolfson v Wolfson, 248 AD2d 479). O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

260 A.D.2d 576, 688 N.Y.S.2d 625, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4079, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferrante-v-ferrante-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack