Ferran v. Monahan

54 A.D.2d 782, 387 N.Y.S.2d 719, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14466

Opinion

Appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court at a Trial Term, entered October 18, 1976 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application in a proceeding pursuant to section 330 of the Election Law, seeking, inter alia, a direction that the respondents place petitioner’s name in a separate row or column on the ballot as a candidate of the Co-Equal Citizen Party for the office of Congressman in the 29th Congressional District. Inasmuch as the petitioner is the sole candidate of the Co-Equal Citizen Party he is not entitled to a separate row or column on the ballot (Matter of Robinson v Brock, 255 App Div 308). Although the Free Libertarian Party, if possible, would be entitled to a separate row or column on the ballot, the fact that that party and the Co-Equal Citizen Party have been made to share a row or column on the ballot has not been shown to unjustly discriminate against the candidates of either party to their prejudice (Matter of Haskell v Voorhis, 246 NY 256; cf. Matter of Battista v Power, 16 NY2d 198). Judgment affirmed, without costs. Sweeney, J. P., Kane, Main, Larkin and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ferran v. Monahan, 54 A.D.2d 782, 387 N.Y.S.2d 719, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14466 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

54 A.D.2d 782 (Ferran v. Monahan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Haskell v. Voorhis
158 N.E. 613 (New York Court of Appeals, 1927)
Robinson v. Brock
255 A.D. 308 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1938)
Battista v. Power
211 N.E.2d 821 (New York Court of Appeals, 1965)