Ferola v. Fulton

675 F. App'x 349
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 3, 2017
DocketNo. 16-7212
StatusPublished

This text of 675 F. App'x 349 (Ferola v. Fulton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ferola v. Fulton, 675 F. App'x 349 (4th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

[350]*350Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael J. Ferola filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action asserting claims of denial of access to the courts and failure to protect. The district court accepted in part the magistrate judge’s recommendation and granted summary judgment to defendants on Ferola’s access to the courts claims. The surviving failure to protect claim against Defendant Fulton proceeded to trial and the jury ruled in Fulton’s favor. Ferola appeals the denial of relief on his claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Ferola v. Fulton, No. 9:13-cv-02413-RBH (D.S.C. Mar. 3, 2015 & Aug. 23, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
675 F. App'x 349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferola-v-fulton-ca4-2017.