Fernwood Trout Hatchery, Inc. v. State

50 A.D.2d 1035, 376 N.Y.S.2d 719, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12037
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 24, 1975·No. Claim No. 57987; Claim No. 57988.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

— Appeal from so much of an order of the Court of Claims, entered May 19, 1975, as granted claimants’ motion for inspection of certain documents with respect to the filing of the claim. None of the various written documents, work orders and inspection reports which were directed to be produced by the State were requested in claimants’ notice of motion or their supporting affidavit. Accordingly, the Court of Claims’ grant of relief was beyond that which was sought and, therefore, was improper. As to claimants’ contention that the Court of Claims erred in failing to direct the identification and production of certain employees alleged to have actually performed work which was related to this claim, no notice of appeal has been filed by claimants and we are precluded from reviewing this portion of the order (Ferguson v Bruckman, 164 NY 481). Order insofar as appealed from, reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Kane, Koreman, Larkin and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fernwood Trout Hatchery, Inc. v. State, 50 A.D.2d 1035, 376 N.Y.S.2d 719, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12037 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

50 A.D.2d 1035 (Fernwood Trout Hatchery, Inc. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brennan v. Anesi
283 A.D.2d 693 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Bensen v. State
88 Misc. 2d 1035 (New York State Court of Claims, 1976)
Mink Hollow Development Corp. v. State
87 Misc. 2d 61 (New York State Court of Claims, 1976)